¿Es la mente no lineal?
Palabras clave:
Teoría del conocimiento, Investigaciones de cognición, Cognición en niño, Psicología cognoscitiva, Psicología evolutiva
Autores
Rebeca Puche Navarro
Universidad del Valle
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Capítulo 1
AYOUB, C. C., & FISCHER, K. W. (2006). Devcelopmental pathways and intersections among domains of development. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Handbook of early child deve- lopment (pp. 62-82). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757703.ch4
CAMPOS, D. (2007). Memorias seminario doctoral. Universidad del Valle, Cali-Colombia.
COMBARIZA, E. (2006). Memorias seminario doctoral. Universidad del Valle, Cali-Colombia.
COMBARIZA, E. (2007). Memorias seminario doctoral. Universidad del Valle, Cali-Colombia.
DAWSON, T. L., FISCHER, K. W., & STEIN, Z. (2006). Reconsidering qualitative and quantitative research approaches: A cognitive developmental perspective. New Ideas in Psychology, 24, 229- 239.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.10.001
FISCHER, K. W., KNIGHT, C.C., & Van Parys, M. (1993). Analyzing diversity in Developmental Pathways: Methods and concepts. In R. Case & W. Edelstein (Eds.), The new structuralism in cognitive development: Theory and research on individual pathways. Contributions to human development, Vol. 23., (pp. 33-56).
https://doi.org/10.1159/000421905
FISCHER, K.W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hie- rarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477-531
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.477
FISCHER, K.W., & CORRIGAN, R. (1981). A skill approach to language development. In R. Stark (Ed.), Language behavior in infancy and early childhood (pp. 245-273). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
FISCHER, K.W., & BIDELL, T.R. (1991). Constraining nativist inferences about cognitive ca- pacities. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 199-235.
FISCHER, K. W., AYOUB, C. C., NOAM, G. G., SINGH, I., MARAGANORE, A., & RAYA, P. (1997). Psychopathology as adaptive development along distinctive pathways. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 749-779.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579497001429
FISCHER, K. W., & DAWSON, T. L. (2002). A New Kind of Developmental Science: Using Models to Integrate Theory and Research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 67.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5834.671184
FISCHER, K. W., & YAN, Z. (2002). The development of dynamic skill theory. In R. Lickliter & D. Lewkowicz (Eds.), Conceptions of development: Lessons from the laboratory. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
FISCHER, K. W., YAN, Z., & STEWART, J. (2003). Adult cognitive development: Dynamics in the developmental web. In J. Valsiner & K. Connolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psy- chology. pp. 491-516. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608306.n21
FISCHER, K. W., & BIDELL, T. R. (2006). Dynamic development of action, thought, and emo- tion. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol 1: Theoretical models of human development(6th ed., pp. 313-399 ). New York: Wiley.
FOGEL, A. (1995). Relational narratives of the prelinguistic self. In Paul Rochat (Ed.), The self in infancy: Theory and research (pp.117-139). Amsterdam.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(05)80009-3
FOGEL, A. (2001). A relational perspective on the self and emotions. In Harke A. Bosma & E. Saskia. Kunnen (Eds.), Identity and emotion: Development through self-organization (pp.93- 114). Cambridge: University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598425.009
FOGEL, A., De KOEYER, I.; BELLAGAMBA, F., & BELL, H. (2002). The dialogical self in the first two years of life: Embarking on a journey of discovery. Theory and Psychology, 12, 191-205.
GLEICK, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a New Science. Sphere Books Ltd, London.
HOFBAUER, J. & SIGMUND, K. (1988). The Theory of Evolution and Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
HOLLENSTEIN, T., & LEWIS, M.D. (2006). A state space analysis of emotion and flexibility in parent-child interactions. Emotion, 6, 663-669.
https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.656
HOLLENSTEIN, T.,(2007) State space grids: Analyzing dynamics across development. Interna- tional Journal of Behavioral Development 2007, 31 (4), 384-396 http://www.sagepublications. com
https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077765
HOLLENSTEIN, T., & LEWIS, M.D. (2009). Temporal Dynamics of Social Interaction: State Space Grid Analyses. Video-conference. Memorias seminario doctoral. Universidad del Valle, Cali-Colombia.
ISAZA, J. F., & CAMPOS, D. (2005). Modelos dinámicos de guerra: el conflicto colombiano. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 29(110), 133-148.
ISAZA, J. F., & CAMPOS, D. (2006). Ecología: Una mirada desde los sistemas dinámicos. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana: Bogotá.
KARCHER, M. J. & FISCHER, K.W. (2004). A Developmental Sequence of Skills in Adolescents' Intergroup Understanding. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 25 (2004) 259-282.
LAMEY, A., HOLLENSTEIN, T., LEWIS, M.D., & GRANIC, I. (2004). GridWare (Version 1.1).
[Computer software]. http://www.statespacegrids.org.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2004.04.001
LEWIS, M.D. (2000a). Three time scales of self-organizing emotions. In M.D. Lewis & I. Granic (Eds.), Emotion, development, and self-organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotio- nal development (pp. 37-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527883.004
LEWIS, M. D. (2000b). The promise of Dynamic Systems Approaches for an integrated Account of Human Development. Child Development, 71(1), 36-43.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00116
LEWIS, M. D. (2004).Reorganization in coping behaviour at 1 1/2 years: dynamic systems and normative change. Developmental Science 7(1), 56-73.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00323.x
LEWIS, M.D. (2005). Self-organizing individual differences in brain development. Developmental Review, 25, 252-277.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.006
LEWIS, M. D., LAMEY, A. V., & DOUGLAS, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science, 2, 458-476.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00090
LEWIS, M. D., & HOWE, M. L (2005). The importance of dynamic systems approaches for un- derstanding development. Developmental Review, 25, 247-251.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.09.002
LORENZ, E. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130-141.
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2
LOTKA, A. J. (1925). Elements of physical biology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co.
MASCOLO, M. F., & FISCHER, K. W. (2007). The co-development of self and socio-moral emo- tions during the toddler years. In C. A. Brownell & C. B. Kopp (Eds.), Transitions in early socioemotional development: The toddler years. New York: Guilford.
MASCOLO, M. J., FISCHER, K. W., & LI, J. (2003). Dynamic development of component systems of emotions: Pride, shame, and guilt in China and the United States. In R. J. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of Affective Science (pp. 375-408). Oxford,U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Mc NABB, D., (1999). Peirce y la teoría del caos. Manuscrito del Instituto de Filosofía, Universi- dad Veracruzana, México.
MUNNÉ, F. (2004). El Retorno de la Complejidad y la Nueva Imagen del SerHumano: Hacia una Psicología Compleja. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia. Vol. 38, Num. 1 pp. 21-29
MUNNÉ, F. (2007). ¿La explicación del comportamiento humano debe ser lo más simple posible o lo más compleja posible? Encuentros en Psicología Social, 4, 3-10.
NAVARRO, J. (2005). La psicología social de las organizaciones desde la perspectiva de la com- plejidad. Revisión y estado actual de una relación prometedora. Encuentros en Psicología So- cial, 3 (2), 78-87.
POINCARÉ, H. (1892-99). Les méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste Paris, Gauthier-Villars et fils.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742713
ROSE, L. T., & FISCHER, K. W. (in press). Dynamic systems theory. In R. A. Shweder (Ed.), Chicago companion to the child. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
SCHWARTZ, M. S., & FISCHER, K. W. (2005). Building general knowledge and skill: Cognition and microdevelopment in science learning. In A. Demetriou & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.), Cogniti- ve developmental change: Theories, models, and measurement. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489938.006
SMITH, L. B., & THELEN, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 7, 343-348.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
STEENBEEK, H., & van GEERT, P. (2005). A Dynamic Systems Model of Dyadic Interaction du- ring Play of Two Children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2 (2), 105-145.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620544000020
STENGERS, I. (1998). Los episodios galileanos. En la historia de las ciencias. Ediciones Cátedra: Madrid.
THELEN, E., & SMITH, L.B. (1994). A dynamic system approach to the development of cogni- tion and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
THELEN, E., & SMITH, L.B. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. 5th edition. Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human deve- lopment (pp. 189-232). New York: Wiley.
van DIJK, M., & van GEERT, P. (2007). Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and Child De- velopment, 16 (1), 7-33.
https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.506
van GEERT, P. (1998). We almost had a great future behind us: the contribution of non-linear dy- namics to developmental science in the making. Developmental Science, 1, 143-159.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00020
van GEERT, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner and K. J. Conolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental Psychology. London: Sage. pp. 640-672.
van GEERT, P., & STEENBEEK, H. (2005). Explaining after by before. Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25 (3-4), 408-442.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003
van GEERT, P., & van DIJK, M. (2002). Focus on variability; new tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 340-374.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00140-6
VOLTERRA, V. (1926). Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi. Mem. R. Accad. Naz. dei Lincei. Ser. VI, vol. 2.
WATSON, M.W., & FISCHER, K.W. (1980). Development of social roles in elicited and sponta- neous behavior. Developmental Psychology, 16, 483-494.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.16.5.483
YAN, Z., & FISCHER, K. W. (2007). Pattern emergence and pattern transition in microdeve- lopmental variation: Evidence of complex dynamics of developmental processes. Journal of Developmental Processes, 2(2), 39-62.
Capítulo 2
BRIGGS, J., & P., PEAT, F.D. (1996). A través del maravilloso espejo del universo. Barcelona: Gedisa.
CAMPOS, D. (2005). Caos y Complejidad. Innovación y Ciencia, XII, No. 4 p.82-91
CORNEJO ÁLVAREZ, A. (1997). Complejidad y Caos. Madrid: Ediciones Castillo.
COURAGE, M. L., & HOWE, M. L. (2002). From Infant to child. The dynamics of cognitive change in the second year of life. Psycological Bulletin, 128, 250-277.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.250
FISCHER, H.R. (1999). Sobre el final de los grandes proyectos. En Fischer, H., Retzer, A., & Schwertzer, J. (Compiladores). El Final de los grandes proyectos. (pp. 11-35). Barcelona: Gedisa.
FISCHER, K. W., & ROSE, S. P. (1999). Rulers, models, and nonlinear dynamics: Measurement and method in developmental research. En Savelsbergh, G., van der Maas, H. & van Geert, P.(Eds.), Nonlinear developmental processes (pp. 197-212).
FISHER, K. & BIDELL, T. (2006). Developmental of psychological structures in action and thought. En R. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of hu- man development (5th ed., pp. 467-561). New York: Wiley.
GLEICK, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a New Science. London: Sphere Books Ltd.
GOTTLIEB, G. (2003). Probabilistic Epigenesis of Development. En Valsiner, J. & Conolly, K.J. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (p. 3-17). London:Sage.
GUTIÉRREZ, F. (2005). Teorías del Desarrollo Cognitivo. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
HEATH, R. (2000). Nonlinear Dynamics. Techniques and Applications in Psychology. London: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates.
HOWE, M. & LEWIS M. (2005). The importance of dynamic systems approaches for understan- ding development. Developmental Review, 25, 247-251.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.09.002
LEWIS, M. D. (2000). The dynamic systems approaches for a integrated account of human deve- lopment. Child Developement, 71, 36-43.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00116
LOMELÍ, H. y RUMBOS, B.(2002). Métodos Dinámicos en Economía. Otra búsqueda del tiempo perdido. México, D.F.:Thomson
LORENZ, E. (1995). La esencia del caos. Madrid: Debate.
LUCE, D. (1995). Four tensions concerning mathematical modeling in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 1-26.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.000245
LUCE, D. (1997). Several unresolved conceptual problems in mathematical psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 79-87.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1997.1150
LUCE, D. (1999). Where is mathematical modeling in psychology headed?. Theory & Psychology, 9, 723-737.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354399096001
MANDELBROT, B. (2006). Los objetos fractales. Barcelons: Tusquets.
MAY, R. (1976) Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261, 459- 467.
https://doi.org/10.1038/261459a0
MAY, R. & OSTER, G. (1976) Bifurcations and dynamic complexity in simple ecological models. American Naturalist, 110, 573-599.
https://doi.org/10.1086/283092
Mc NABB, D. (1999). Peirce y la teoría del caos. Manuscrito del Instituto de Filosofía, Universi- dad Veracruzana, México.
MOLENAAR, P., HUIZENGA, H. & NESSELROADE, J. (2000). The Relationship Between the Structure of Inter individual and Intra-individual Variability: A Theoretical and Empirical Vin- dication of Developmental Systems Theory. En U. M. Staudinger & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Understanding Human Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers
MUNNÉ, F. (2005). ¿Qué es la complejidad? Encuentros de Psicología Social, 3, 6-17.
MUNNÉ, F. (2008). De la Globalización del Mundo a la Globalización de la Mente. Les C@hiers de Psychologie politique, 13.
NAVARRO, J. (2005). La psicología social de las organizaciones desde la perspectiva de la com- plejidad. Revisión y estado actual de una relación prometedora. Encuentros en Psicología So- cial, 3, 78-87.
NAVARRO, J. ARRIETA, C & BALLÉN, C. (2007). Dinámica no lineal en la Motivación en el trabajo: una aproximación a su estudio. Videoconferencia Universidad de Barcelona-Univer- sidad del Valle.
POPPER, K.R (1991) Of Clouds and Clocks and approach to the problem of Rationality and the freedom of man in D. Ciccheti and W. Grove Thinking clear about psychology (Eds) Matters of Public Interest U of Minnesota Press, p 100-140
PRIGOGYNE, I. (1999). Las leyes del caos. Barcelona: Crítica.
RESTREPO, C. (2007). Teoría del caos: sistemas dinámicos y series temporales. Popayán: Edito- rial Restrepo Saavedra.
SAMETBAND, M. J. (1999). Entre el Orden y el Caos: La Complejidad. México: FCE/SEP/ CONACYT.
SMITH, L. B. & THELEN, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 343-348.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
TALANQUER, V. (2002). Fractus, fracta, fractal. Ciencia para todos. México: SEP FCE.
THELEN, E. & SMITH, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cogni- tion and action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
THELEN, E., CORBETTA, D., & SPENCER, J. P. (1996). The development of reaching during the first year: The role of movement speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1059-1076.
VALSINER, J. (2004). El desarrollo de las teorías del desarrollo: la "Hollywoodización" de la ciencia y su impacto. Infancia y aprendizaje, 27, 147 - 154.
https://doi.org/10.1174/021037004323038806
VALLACHER, R. & NOWAK, A. (2007). Dynamical Social Psychology: Finding order in the flow of human experience. En Kuglansky, A. & Higgins, T. Social Psychology. Handbook of basic principles. New York: The Guilford Press van der MAAS, H. (1995). Beyond the metaphor?. Cognitive Development, 10, 621-642.
van GEERT, P.(1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3-53.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.1.3
Van GEERT,P.(1994). Dynamic Systems of Development: Change between Complexity and Chaos. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
van GEERT, P. (1998). We almost had a great future behind us: the contribution of non-linear dy- namics to developmental science in the making. Developmental Science 1, 143-159.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00020
van GEERT, P. & van DIJK, M., (2002). Focus on variability; new tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 340-374.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00140-6
van GEERT, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental process. In Valsiner, J. & Conolly, K. J. (Eds.), Handbook of development psychology (pp. 640-672). London: Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608306.n28
van GEERT, P. & STEENBEEK, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25, 408-442.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003
von BERTALANFFY, L. (1972/1986). Perspectivas en la teoría general de sistemas. España: Alianza Editorial.
YAN, Z., & FISCHER, K. (2002). Always under construction: Dynamics variations in adult cog- nitive microdevelopment. Human Development, 45, 141-160.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000057070
Capítulo 3
ADOLPH, K.E. & Vereijken, B. (2005). Esther Thelen (1942-2004). American Psychologist. 60(9), 1032.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.1032
BEER, R.D. (2006). Beyond control: The dynamics of brain-body-environment interaction in mo- tor systems. En: D. Sternad. (Ed). Progress in Motor Control: A multidisciplinary Perspective. EE.UU: Springer.
BEER, R.D. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, (3), 91-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01440-0
BOWER, B. (1999). Minds on the move. Science News, 155 (12), 184-189.
https://doi.org/10.2307/4011143
de WEERTH, C., van GEERT, P & HOIJTINK, H. (1999). Intraindividual variability in infant behavior. Developmental Psychology 35 (4), 1102 - 1112.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.1102
GHENT, E. (2002). Wish, need, drive: motive in the light of dynamic systems theory and Endelman's Selectionist Theory. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12 (5), 763-808.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881209348705
GRANIC, I., HOLLENSTEIN, T., DISHION, T., & PATTERSON, G. (2003). LongitudinalAnaly- sis of Flexibility and Reorganization in Early Adolescence: A Dynamic Systems Study of Fa- mily Interactions. Developmental Psychology, 39 (3), 606-617.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.606
KELSO, J. A. S. (1999). Dynamic Patterns. The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior. Cam- bridge, EE.UU: A Bradford Book MIT Press.
KOZULIN, A. (1994). La Psicología de Vygotski. Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.
LEWIS, M.D., ZIMMERMAN, S., HOLLENSTEIN, T. & LAMEY, A.V. (2004). Reorganization in coping behavior at 11/2 years: dynamic systems and normative change. Developmental Science, 7 (1), 56-73
LICHTWARCK - ASCHOFF, A., & van GEERT, P. (2004). A dynamic systems perspective on social cognition problematic behavior and intervention in adolescence. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1 (4), 399 - 411.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620444000157
LOCKMAN, J. y THELEN, E. (1993). Brain, body, behavior connections. Special Section Inro- duction. Child Development, 64 (4), 953-959.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04181.x
MOLENAAR, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2 (4), 201-128.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
PIAGET, J. (2000). La equilibración de las estructuras cognitivas. Problema central del desarro- llo. (6ª. Ed). (Trad. E. Bustos). México: Siglo XXI. (Trabajo original publicado en 1975).
RESTREPO, C. J. (2007). Teoría del Caos: Sistemas Dinámicos y Series de Tiempo. Popayán, Colombia: Carlos Julio Restrepo Saavedra.
ROCHA, L. M. (1997). Evidence sets and contextual genetic algorithms: Exploring uncertain- ty, context and embodiment in cognitive and biological systems. N.Y: Binghamton University Doctoral dissertation.
SAVELSBERGH, G., van HOF, P., CALJOUW, S. R., LEDEBT, A., & van der KAMP, J. (2006). No single factor has priority in action development. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 5 (4), 493-505.
SERRA, M., LOTH, F. L., van GEERT, P., HURKENS, E & MINDERAA, R.B. (2002). Theory of mind in children with "lesser variant" of autism: A longitudinal study. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 43 (7), 885 - 900.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00104
SMITH, L., & THELEN, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Scien- ces, 7 (8), 343-348.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
SMITH, L. & THELEN, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in cognitive scien- ce, 7 (8), 343 -348.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
SPENCER, J.P., SMITH, L., & THELEN, E. (2001). Test of a dynamic systems account of the A-Not-B-Error: the influence of prior experience on the spatial memory abilities of two years old. Child Development 72 (5), 1327-1346.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00351
SPENCER, J. P., CORBETTA, D., BUCHANAN, P., CLEARFIELD, M., ULRICH, B., & SCHÖ- NER, G. (2006). Moving toward a grand theory of development: In memory of Esther Thelen. Child Development , 77 (6), 1521-1538.
STEENBEEK, H., & van GEERT, P. (2008). The Empirical Validation of A Dynamic Systems Model Of Interaction: Do Children Of Different Sociometric Status Differ In Their Dyadic Play Interactions? Developmental Science, 11 (2), 253-281.
STEENBEEK, H., & van GEERT, P. (2007). A theory and dynamic model of dyadic interaction: Concerns, appraisals, and contagiousness in a developmental context. Developmental Review, 27, 1 - 40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.06.002
STEENBEEK, H., & van GEERT, P. (2005). A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction du- ring play of two children. European Journal of Development Psychology, 2, 105 - 145.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620544000020
THELEN, E. & MARUYAMA, S. (2004). Invariant timing structures of orchestra conductors' ham strokes. ICMPC8: 8th Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Evanston, IL, Australia.
THELEN, E. & BATES, E. (2003), Connectionism and dynamic systems: are they really different? Development Science 6 (4), 378-391.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00294
THELEN, E. (2000). Motor development as foundation and future of developmental psychology. International Journal of Behavioral Development 24 (4), 385-397.
https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500750037937
THELEN, E. & SMITH, L.B. (1994). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cogni- tion and Action. Cambridg, M.A: MIT Press.
THELEN, E., CORBETTA, D., ZERNICKE, R., SPENCER, J. P., SCHNEIDER, K., & KAMM, K. (1993). The transition to reaching: mapping intention and instinsic dynamics. Child Deve- lopment , 64, 1058-1098.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04188.x
THELEN, E. (1986). Treadmill-Elicited Stepping in Seven-Month-Old Infants. Child Develop- ment, 57 (6), 1498-1506.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1130427
THELEN, E., FISHER, D. & RIDLEY-JOHNSON, R. (1984). The relationship between physical growth and a newborn reflex. Infant Behavior & Development, 7, 479-493.
van DIJK, M. & van GEERT, P. (2007). Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of con- tinuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and child develop- ment, 16, 7 - 33.
https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.506
van DIJK, M. (2004). Child Language Cuts Capers Variability and Ambiguity in Early Child De- velopment. Doctoral Thesis. Department of Developmental and Experimental Clinical Psycho- logy, University of Groningen.
van GEERT, P. (2003). Dynamic system approaches and modeling of developmental process. En J. Vasiner & K. Connolly (Eds). Handbook of developmental psychology. (pp. 640 -672). Lon- don: Sage.
van GEERT, P. (1998a). We almost had a great future behind us: The contribution of non-linear dynamics to developmental science in the making. Developmental science, 1 (1), 143-159.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00020
van GEERT, P. (1998b). A dynamic systems model of basic development mechanism: Piaget, Vygostsky, and beyond. Psychological Review, 105 (4), 634 - 677.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.634-677
van GEERT, P. (1997). Que será, será. Determinism and nonlinear dynamic model building in development. En: A. Fogel., M.C.D.P. Lyra, & J. Valsiner. Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van GEERT, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos.
N.Y. EE. UU: Harverster Wheatsheaf.
Van GEERT, P., & STEENBEEK, H. (2006). The dynamic of scaffolding. New Ideas in Psychology, 23,115-128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.05.003
van GEERT, P., & STEENBEEK, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dyna- mic systems approach to the study of development. Develpmental Review, 25, 408 - 442.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003
van GEERT, P. & van DIJK, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tolos to study intra- indivi- dual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 340-374.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00140-6
Capítulo 4
ADOLPH, K.E. & Vereijken, B. (2005). Esther Thelen (1942-2004). American Psychologist. 60(9), 1032.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.1032
BEER, R.D. (2006). Beyond control: The dynamics of brain-body-environment interaction in mo- tor systems. En: D. Sternad. (Ed). Progress in Motor Control: A multidisciplinary Perspective. EE.UU: Springer.
BEER, R.D. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, (3), 91-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01440-0
BOWER, B. (1999). Minds on the move. Science News, 155 (12), 184-189.
https://doi.org/10.2307/4011143
de WEERTH, C., van GEERT, P & HOIJTINK, H. (1999). Intraindividual variability in infant behavior. Developmental Psychology 35 (4), 1102 - 1112.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.1102
GHENT, E. (2002). Wish, need, drive: motive in the light of dynamic systems theory and Endelman's Selectionist Theory. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12 (5), 763-808.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881209348705
GRANIC, I., HOLLENSTEIN, T., DISHION, T., & PATTERSON, G. (2003). LongitudinalAnaly- sis of Flexibility and Reorganization in Early Adolescence: A Dynamic Systems Study of Fa- mily Interactions. Developmental Psychology, 39 (3), 606-617.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.606
KELSO, J. A. S. (1999). Dynamic Patterns. The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior. Cam- bridge, EE.UU: A Bradford Book MIT Press.
KOZULIN, A. (1994). La Psicología de Vygotski. Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.
LEWIS, M.D., ZIMMERMAN, S., HOLLENSTEIN, T. & LAMEY, A.V. (2004). Reorganization in coping behavior at 11/2 years: dynamic systems and normative change. Developmental Science, 7 (1), 56-73
LICHTWARCK - ASCHOFF, A., & van GEERT, P. (2004). A dynamic systems perspective on social cognition problematic behavior and intervention in adolescence. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1 (4), 399 - 411.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620444000157
LOCKMAN, J. y THELEN, E. (1993). Brain, body, behavior connections. Special Section Inro- duction. Child Development, 64 (4), 953-959.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04181.x
MOLENAAR, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2 (4), 201-128.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
PIAGET, J. (2000). La equilibración de las estructuras cognitivas. Problema central del desarro- llo. (6ª. Ed). (Trad. E. Bustos). México: Siglo XXI. (Trabajo original publicado en 1975).
POUTHAS,V., & JOUEN, F. (1993). Les comportements du bébé expresión de son savoir? Mar-daga :Liège
RESTREPO, C. J. (2007). Teoría del Caos: Sistemas Dinámicos y Series de Tiempo. Popayán, Colombia: Carlos Julio Restrepo Saavedra.
ROCHA, L. M. (1997). Evidence sets and contextual genetic algorithms: Exploring uncertain- ty, context and embodiment in cognitive and biological systems. N.Y: Binghamton University Doctoral dissertation.
SAVELSBERGH, G., van HOF, P., CALJOUW, S. R., LEDEBT, A., & van der KAMP, J. (2006). No single factor has priority in action development. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 5 (4), 493-505.
SERRA, M., LOTH, F. L., van GEERT, P., HURKENS, E & MINDERAA, R.B. (2002). Theory of mind in children with "lesser variant" of autism: A longitudinal study. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 43 (7), 885 - 900.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00104
SMITH, L., & THELEN, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Scien- ces, 7 (8), 343-348.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
SMITH, L. & THELEN, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in cognitive scien- ce, 7 (8), 343 -348.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
SPENCER, J.P., SMITH, L., & THELEN, E. (2001). Test of a dynamic systems account of the A-Not-B-Error: the influence of prior experience on the spatial memory abilities of two years old. Child Development 72 (5), 1327-1346.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00351
SPENCER, J. P., CORBETTA, D., BUCHANAN, P., CLEARFIELD, M., ULRICH, B., & SCHÖ- NER, G. (2006). Moving toward a grand theory of development: In memory of Esther Thelen. Child Development , 77 (6), 1521-1538.
STEENBEEK, H., & van GEERT, P. (2008). The Empirical Validation of A Dynamic Systems Model Of Interaction: Do Children Of Different Sociometric Status Differ In Their Dyadic Play Interactions? Developmental Science, 11 (2), 253-281.
STEENBEEK, H., & van GEERT, P. (2007). A theory and dynamic model of dyadic interaction: Concerns, appraisals, and contagiousness in a developmental context. Developmental Review, 27, 1 - 40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.06.002
STEENBEEK, H., & van GEERT, P. (2005). A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction du- ring play of two children. European Journal of Development Psychology, 2, 105 - 145.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620544000020
THELEN, E. & MARUYAMA, S. (2004). Invariant timing structures of orchestra conductors' ham strokes. ICMPC8: 8th Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Evanston, IL, Australia.
THELEN, E. & BATES, E. (2003), Connectionism and dynamic systems: are they really different? Development Science 6 (4), 378-391.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00294
THELEN, E. (2000). Motor development as foundation and future of developmental psychology. International Journal of Behavioral Development 24 (4), 385-397.
https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500750037937
THELEN, E. & SMITH, L.B. (1994). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cogni- tion and Action. Cambridg, M.A: MIT Press.
THELEN, E., CORBETTA, D., ZERNICKE, R., SPENCER, J. P., SCHNEIDER, K., & KAMM, K. (1993). The transition to reaching: mapping intention and instinsic dynamics. Child Deve- lopment , 64, 1058-1098.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04188.x
THELEN, E. (1986). Treadmill-Elicited Stepping in Seven-Month-Old Infants. Child Develop- ment, 57 (6), 1498-1506.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1130427
THELEN, E., FISHER, D. & RIDLEY-JOHNSON, R. (1984). The relationship between physical growth and a newborn reflex. Infant Behavior & Development, 7, 479-493.
van DIJK, M. & van GEERT, P. (2007). Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of con- tinuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and child develop- ment, 16, 7 - 33.
https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.506
van DIJK, M. (2004). Child Language Cuts Capers Variability and Ambiguity in Early Child De- velopment. Doctoral Thesis. Department of Developmental and Experimental Clinical Psycho- logy, University of Groningen.
van GEERT, P. (2003). Dynamic system approaches and modeling of developmental process. En J. Vasiner & K. Connolly (Eds). Handbook of developmental psychology. (pp. 640 -672). Lon- don: Sage.
van GEERT, P. (1998a). We almost had a great future behind us: The contribution of non-linear dynamics to developmental science in the making. Developmental science, 1 (1), 143-159.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00020
van GEERT, P. (1998b). A dynamic systems model of basic development mechanism: Piaget, Vygostsky, and beyond. Psychological Review, 105 (4), 634 - 677.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.634-677
van GEERT, P. (1997). Que será, será. Determinism and nonlinear dynamic model building in development. En: A. Fogel., M.C.D.P. Lyra, & J. Valsiner. Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van GEERT, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos.
N.Y. EE. UU: Harverster Wheatsheaf.
Van GEERT, P., & STEENBEEK, H. (2006). The dynamic of scaffolding. New Ideas in Psychology, 23,115-128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.05.003
van GEERT, P., & STEENBEEK, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dyna- mic systems approach to the study of development. Develpmental Review, 25, 408 - 442.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003
van GEERT, P. & van DIJK, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tolos to study intra- indivi- dual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 340-374.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00140-6
WESTERANN, G., MARESCHAL, D., JOHNSON, M.H., SIROIS, S., SPRATILING, MICHAEL W., & THOMAS. M.S.C. (2007). Neuroconstructivism. Development Science Review, 10 (1),75-83
Capítulo 5
ANISOV, A. M. (2000). Temporal'nyi universum I ego poznanie [The temporal universe and its perception]. Moscow: RANIF
ANISOV, A. M. (2002). Logika neopredelennosti i neopredelennost' vo vremeni [The logic of inde-terminacy and indeterminacy in time]. Logical Studies, 8, 1-27.
BALDWIN, J. M. (1906). Thought and things: A study of the development and meaning of thought, or genetic logic. Vol. 1. Functional logic, or genetic theory of knowledge. London: Swan Son- nenschein & Co.
BALDWIN, J. M. (1908). Thought and things: A study of the development and meaning of thought, or genetic logic. Vol. 2. Experimental logic, or genetic theory of thought. London: Swan Son- nenschein & Co.
BALDWIN, J. M. (1911). Thought and things: A study of the development and meaning of thought, or genetic logic. Vol 3. Interest and art being real logic. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.
BAR-YAM, Y., HARMON, D., and de BIVOORT, B (2009). Attractors and democratic dynamics. Science, 323, 1016-1017.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163225
KVALE, S. (2003). The church, the factory and the market: Scenarios for psychology in a postmo- dern age. Theory & Psychology, 13, 5, 579-603.
https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543030135005
MARUYAMA, M. (1963). The second cybernetics: Deviation amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist, 51, 164-179.
MARUYAMA, M. (1988). This week's citation classic: Maruyama (1963). Current Contents: So- cial & Behavioral Sciences, 20, 8, 12
MARUYAMA, M. (1999). Heterogram analysis: where the assumption of normal distribution is illogical. Human Systems Management, 18, 53-60.
https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-1999-18107
MOLENAAR, P.C.M. (2004), A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever, Measurement: Interdisciplinary re-search and perspectives, 2, 201-218
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
MOLENAAR, P. C. M. (2007). Psychological methodology will change profoundly due to the necessity to focus on intra-individual variation. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 41, 1, 35-40.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9011-1
PRIOR, A. N. (1957). Time and modality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
PRIOR, A. N. (1967). Past, present, and future. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198243113.001.0001
ROSSETTI-FERREIRA, M. C., de Souza Amorim, K., Soares da Silva, A. P., and A. M. Almeida Carvalho, A. M. (Eds) (2006). Rede de significações e o studio do desenvolvimento humano.Porto Alegre: ArtMed Editora.
RUDOLPH, L. (2006a). The fullness of time. Culture & Psychology, 12, 2, 169-204.
RUDOLPH, L. (2006b) Mathematics, models, and metaphors. Culture & Psychology, 12, 2, 245-259.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X06064577
SALVATORE, S., VALSINER, J., STROUT-YAGODZYNSKI, S. and CLEGG, J. (Eds.) (2009).
YIS 2008: yearbook of idiographic science. Rome: G. Firreira.
SATO, T.,YASUDA,Y., KIDO,A.,ARAKAWA,A., MIZOGUCHI, H., and VALSINER, J. (2007).
Sampling reconsidered: Idiographic science and the analyses of personal life trajectories. In J. Valsiner, , & A. Rosa, A. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Socio-Cultural Psychology (pp. 82- 106). New York: Cambridge University Press.
TOOMELA, A. (2007). Culture of science: Strange history of the methodological thinking in psy- chology. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 41, 1, 6-20.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9004-0
TSUDA, I. (2001). Toward an interpretation of dynamic neural activity in terms of chaotic dyna- mic systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 793-847
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000097
VALSINER, J. (1994). Commentary (on P. van Geert's Vygotskian Dynamics of Development) Human Development, 37, 366-369..
https://doi.org/10.1159/000278281
VALSINER, J. (2004). The Promoter Sign: Developmental transformation within the structure of Dialogical Self. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development (ISSBD), Gent, July, 12 ( Symposium Developmental aspects of the dialogical self-Hubert Hermans, Convener)
VALSINER, J. (2005). Attractors, repulsors, and directors: making Dynamic Systems Theory de- velopmental. Annual Report 2003-2004 of Research and Clinical Center for Child Develop- ment, Graduate School of Education, Hokkaido University. Sapporo, No. 27, 13-25.
VALSINER, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi: Sage.
VALSINER, J. ( 2009a). Integrating psychology within the globalizing world. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 43, 1, 1-16.
VALSINER, J. ( 2009b). Cultural psychology today: Innovations and oversights. Culture & Psy- chology, 15, 1, 5-40.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X08101427
VALSINER, J., & SATO, T. (2006). Historically Structured Sampling (HSS): How can psychology's methodology become tuned in to the reality of the historical nature of cultural psychology? In J. Straub, D. Weidemann, C. Kölbl & B. Zielke (Eds.), Pursuit of meaning (pp. 215-251). Bie- lefeld: transcript
Publicado
2018-02-20
Series
Derechos de autor 2020 Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Detalles sobre esta monografía
ISBN-13 (15)
978-958-765-612-1
